This proves that you reading this are probably a motorist
traveling and not a driver driving. But your schools, 
parents, and friends all told you that driving is a 
privelege and not a right. But what is a driver ?????
A person who receives financial compensation from
transporting the public is a driver according to
law researchers. If you just travel about in your car
you probably are not a driver. If you are not a driver
then you have a constitutional right to travel about
in your car without being required to have a driver's
License, register your car or buy auto insurance !!!!
Take this to your lawyer !!!!!!! or upload to Special
Interest Law Bulletin Boards such as (805)273-8476,
(214)522-1963, (212)409-4194, (313)774-7258.
*
Smart Brave Lady
322730 South Mill 
Tempe, Arizona
*
Accused
*
            In the municipal Court of the City of Some City
            In the County of You Name it, State of Your Choice
STATE OF Your Choice          )
                              )  NOTICE OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE 
               Plaintiff      )      DEMAND TO DISMISS
                              )                v.
                              )         68999990C
                              )      No.68888890V 
Smart Brave Lady              )         68777777V
                              )
              Accused         ) -------------------------- 
*
     The accused, Smart Brave Lady, hereby gives Notice of
her  continued special appearance before this tribunal, as 
it is in  want of subject matter jurisdiction and
jurisdiction of the  person of the accused.  The lack of 
jurisdiction arises under the  doctrine of primary 
jurisdiction and the plaintiff has made  finding of facts, 
upon which this Court must take judicial notice  to 
convict, without affording an opportunity to be heard and 
the  plaintiff has otherwise failed to exhaust its 
administrative  remedies.
*    Accordingly this Court should discharge the offenses
brought  against the accused, or issue a stay in
proceedings pending the  outcome of a proper hearing
in the agency or issue an order to  show cause to the
plantiff why these offenses should not be  discharged
or the proceedings stayed pending proper agency  action.
*    This Notice of Special Appearance is supported by 
the  attached statement of facts and points of authority. 
*
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 5th day of July, 1989 
*
*
*                                ______________________ 
*                                Smart Brave Lady 
*
*
*           STATEMENT OF FACTS AND POINTS OF AUTHORITY 
*
The accused declares the following facts to be true to 
the best  ot her knowledge and belief. 
*
1. The accused has the unalienable vested right to travel 
upon  the highways without submitting to regulation under 
the police  powers of the State of Arizona. 
2. The accused's property, the car in which she is 
traveling, is  a household good exempt from taxation 
and accorded regulation in  accordance with Article 
IX, &2, Clause 1 of the Constitution for  the  State of 
Arizona. 
3. Notwithstanding the fact, by this provision of 
Constitution,  the accused has no duty to inform 
the agency that she has taken  advantage of such 
exemption, she has requested attempting to  obtain a 
hearing before the agency to determine whether her 
use  of her automobile is for a commercial purpose. 
(See Exhibit A) 
4. The hearing has not been held as of this time 
and the agency  has just recently responded to her 
initial request.  (See Exhibit  B) 
5. The accused has information and reason to believe 
that the  officer, who issued the citations, made an 
administrative  determination at the roadside that 
the accused's property was a  motor vehicle, subject 
to the license tax, and that the accused  was driving 
said alleged motor vehicle for hire. 
6. The accused contends that her car is not a motor vehicle  
subject to the license tax, and that she is traveling and 
not  driving.
7. The accused has infromation and reason to believe that 
the  office has not been designated to make administrative 
findings on  disputes between the accused and the Motor 
Vehicles Division of  the Arizona Department of Revenue.